Who is better, Khan or Dube?
Shivam Dube leads with a GOAT score of 47.0 against 46.3 for Azam Khan — a gap of 0.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Khan vs Dube
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Shivam Dube above Azam Khan: 47.0 vs 46.3. Shivam Dube leads on Statistics, Peak, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
DubeWinner
47.0Dube wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Khan
46.3Khan wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/ros-azam-khan-vs-ros-shivam-dube
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🏳️ Shivam Dube
47.0
Dube leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Shivam Dube
2. Azam Khan
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🏳️ Azam Khan5 years played · career day 1,8251,579 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏳️ Shivam Dube5 years played · career day 1,8251,267 runs
-19.8% vs Khan at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Khan | 0 | 0 | 12 | 162 | 1,579 | 2,047 |
| 🏳️ Dube | 0 | 0 | 113 | 283 | 1,267 | 2,407 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Dube47.0
Khan46.3
FAQ
Where does Khan beat Dube?
Khan does not lead any of the five categories; Dube is ahead or level on all of them.
How is the Khan vs Dube score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Khan: 46.3, Dube: 47.0.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Khan vs Dube. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.