Who is better, Goodrow or Schmidt?
Barclay Goodrow leads with a GOAT score of 50.6 against 50.3 for Nate Schmidt — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Goodrow wins: Dominance, Honours
Schmidt wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-barclay-goodrow-vs-ros-nate-schmidt
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Goodrow leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Goodrow | 0 | 0 | 12 | 15 | 47 | 157 |
| 🏳️ Schmidt | 0 | 0 | 6 | 10 | 79 | 187 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Barclay Goodrow leads with a GOAT score of 50.6 against 50.3 for Nate Schmidt — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Schmidt scores higher on peak, statistics, longevity. Goodrow leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Goodrow: 50.6, Schmidt: 50.3.
Make your case for Goodrow vs Schmidt. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.