Who is better, Simmons or Porziņģis?
Ben Simmons leads with a GOAT score of 56.6 against 56.2 for Kristaps Porziņģis — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Simmons wins: Dominance, Honours
Porziņģis wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-ben-simmons-vs-ros-kristaps-porzingis
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Simmons leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Simmons | 0 | 0 | 1,280 | 2,615 | 4,379 | 5,273 |
| 🏳️ Porziņģis | 0 | 0 | 1,030 | 2,225 | 3,315 | 10,055 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SimmonsActive · Sacramento Kings | PorziņģisActive · Golden State Warriors |
|---|---|---|
| NBA games | 434 | 616 |
| NBA points | 5,273 | 11,941 |
| NBA award: All-Defensive 1st Team | 2 | — |
| NBA award: All-NBA 3rd Team | 1 | — |
| NBA award: Rookie of the Year | 1 | — |
| NBA award: All-Rookie 1st Team | 1 | 1 |
| Number | 25 | 7 |
| NBA award: EuroCup Basketball Rising Star | — | 1 |
| 2018 NBA All-Star Game | — | 1 |
| NBA All-Rookie Team | — | 1 |
| EuroCup Basketball Rising Star | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 57.6 | 52.1 |
| Peak w20% | 65.2 | 72.3 |
| Longevity w20% | 47.4 | 57 |
| Honours w20% | 50 | 32 |
| Statistics w15% | 64.2 | 72.8 |
Ben Simmons leads with a GOAT score of 56.6 against 56.2 for Kristaps Porziņģis — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Porziņģis scores higher on peak, statistics, longevity. Simmons leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Simmons: 56.6, Porziņģis: 56.2.
Make your case for Simmons vs Porziņģis. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.