Who is better, Mathurin or Wagner?
Bennedict Mathurin leads with a GOAT score of 48.7 against 48.5 for Franz Wagner — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Mathurin vs Wagner
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MathurinWinner
48.7Mathurin wins: Dominance, Peak
Wagner
48.5Wagner wins: Longevity, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to BasketballShareable URL · /compare/ros-bennedict-mathurin-vs-ros-franz-wagner
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🏳️ Bennedict Mathurin
48.7
Mathurin leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Bennedict Mathurin
2. Franz Wagner
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🏳️ Franz Wagner5 seasons played · career day 1,8256,259 points per game
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏳️ Bennedict Mathurin4 seasons played · career day 1,4605,218 points per game
-16.6% vs Wagner at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Mathurin | 0 | 0 | 1,303 | 2,159 | 5,218 | 5,218 |
| 🏳️ Wagner | 0 | 0 | 1,201 | 2,689 | 6,259 | 6,259 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Mathurin48.7
Wagner48.5
FAQ
Where does Wagner beat Mathurin?
Wagner scores higher on statistics, longevity. Mathurin leads on peak, dominance.
How is the Mathurin vs Wagner score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Mathurin: 48.7, Wagner: 48.5.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Mathurin vs Wagner. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.