GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Kumar vs Hazlewood

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
KumarWinner
72.0

Kumar wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity

Hazlewood
71.5

Hazlewood wins: Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/ros-bhuvneshwar-kumar-vs-ros-josh-hazlewood

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🏳️ Bhuvneshwar Kumar
72.0

Kumar leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.

1. Bhuvneshwar Kumar
72.0
2. Josh Hazlewood
71.5

Category breakdown

Season form · Form index per season

Career timeline · Form index per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Form index per season
1. 🏳️ Bhuvneshwar Kumar5 years played · career day 1,825164 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏳️ Josh Hazlewood5 years played · career day 2,556153 runs
-6.7% vs Kumar at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🏳️ Kumar00317164369
🏳️ Hazlewood001126240

Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.

MetricKumarActive · Royal Challengers BengaluruHazlewoodActive · Royal Challengers Bengaluru
Matches (T20 leagues + internationals)417267
Runs1,491743
Wickets487567
Player of the match1710
Number1538
Dominance w25%71.471.2
Peak w20%72.872.3
Longevity w20%7369.8
Honours w20%7070
Statistics w15%73.475

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Kumar72.0
Hazlewood71.5
The people
Kumar
Hazlewood

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

FAQ

Who is better, Kumar or Hazlewood?

Bhuvneshwar Kumar leads with a GOAT score of 72.0 against 71.5 for Josh Hazlewood — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.

Where does Hazlewood beat Kumar?

Hazlewood scores higher on statistics. Kumar leads on peak, dominance, longevity.

How is the Kumar vs Hazlewood score calculated?

Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kumar: 72.0, Hazlewood: 71.5.

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Kumar vs Hazlewood. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →