GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Coleman vs Foligno

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ColemanWinner
52.9

Coleman wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Foligno
52.7

Foligno wins: Longevity, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Ice Hockey

Shareable URL · /compare/ros-blake-coleman-vs-ros-marcus-foligno

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🏳️ Blake Coleman
52.9

Coleman leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.

1. Blake Coleman
52.9
2. Marcus Foligno
52.7

Category breakdown

Season form · Points per season

Career timeline · Points per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Points per season
1. 🏳️ Blake Coleman5 seasons played · career day 1,826126 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏳️ Marcus Foligno5 seasons played · career day 1,82593 points
-26.2% vs Coleman at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🏳️ Coleman0022795290
🏳️ Foligno00133193183

Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.

MetricColemanActive · Minnesota WildFolignoActive · Minnesota Wild
NHL games693931
NHL goals170148
NHL assists155188
NHL points325336
NHL award: Stanley Cup2—
Number2017
NHL award: King Clancy Memorial Trophy—1
Dominance w25%48.543.1
Peak w20%64.960.2
Longevity w20%5773
Honours w20%3226
Statistics w15%66.566.9

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Coleman52.9
Foligno52.7
The people
Coleman
Foligno

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

FAQ

Who is better, Coleman or Foligno?

Blake Coleman leads with a GOAT score of 52.9 against 52.7 for Marcus Foligno — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.

Where does Foligno beat Coleman?

Foligno scores higher on statistics, longevity. Coleman leads on peak, dominance, honours.

How is the Coleman vs Foligno score calculated?

Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Coleman: 52.9, Foligno: 52.7.

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Coleman vs Foligno. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →