Who is better, Beal or McCollum?
CJ McCollum leads with a GOAT score of 59.2 against 59.1 for Bradley Beal — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks CJ McCollum above Bradley Beal: 59.2 vs 59.1. CJ McCollum leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics. Bradley Beal leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →McCollum wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Beal wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-bradley-beal-vs-ros-cj-mccollum
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
McCollum leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Beal | 0 | 0 | 778 | 2,026 | 5,726 | 13,294 |
| 🏳️ McCollum | 0 | 0 | 201 | 623 | 5,860 | 12,710 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BealActive · Los Angeles Clippers | McCollumActive · Atlanta Hawks |
|---|---|---|
| NBA games | 807 | 1,001 |
| NBA points | 17,297 | 19,626 |
| NBA award: All-NBA 3rd Team | 1 | — |
| NBA award: All-Rookie 1st Team | 1 | — |
| Number | 3 | 3 |
| NBA award: Most Improved Player | — | 1 |
| NBA award: NBA Most Improved Player Award | — | 1 |
| Patriot League Men's Basketball Player of the Year | — | 2x |
| NBA Most Improved Player Award | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 52.3 | 53.2 |
| Peak w20% | 72.6 | 74.5 |
| Longevity w20% | 69.8 | 66.6 |
| Honours w20% | 32 | 32 |
| Statistics w15% | 74.6 | 74.9 |
CJ McCollum leads with a GOAT score of 59.2 against 59.1 for Bradley Beal — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Beal scores higher on longevity. McCollum leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Beal: 59.1, McCollum: 59.2.
Make your case for Beal vs McCollum. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.