Who is better, Schenn or Karlsson?
Brayden Schenn leads with a GOAT score of 57.1 against 56.9 for William Karlsson — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Brayden Schenn above William Karlsson: 57.1 vs 56.9. Brayden Schenn leads on Longevity, Statistics. William Karlsson leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Schenn wins: Longevity, Statistics
Karlsson wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-brayden-schenn-vs-ros-william-karlsson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Schenn leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Schenn | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 87 | 318 |
| 🏳️ Karlsson | 0 | 0 | 5 | 25 | 184 | 357 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SchennActive · New York Islanders | KarlssonActive · Vegas Golden Knights |
|---|---|---|
| NHL games | 1,102 | 752 |
| NHL goals | 296 | 183 |
| NHL assists | 428 | 270 |
| NHL points | 724 | 453 |
| NHL award: Stanley Cup | 1 | 1 |
| Number | 10 | 71 |
| NHL award: Lady Byng Memorial Trophy | — | 1 |
| Lady Byng Memorial Trophy | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 47.9 | 51.9 |
| Peak w20% | 69.7 | 71.8 |
| Longevity w20% | 75 | 63.4 |
| Honours w20% | 26 | 32 |
| Statistics w15% | 73.5 | 69.9 |
Brayden Schenn leads with a GOAT score of 57.1 against 56.9 for William Karlsson — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Karlsson scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Schenn leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Schenn: 57.1, Karlsson: 56.9.
Make your case for Schenn vs Karlsson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.