Who is better, Hield or Fox?
Buddy Hield leads with a GOAT score of 58.9 against 58.4 for De'Aaron Fox — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Hield wins: Longevity, Statistics
Fox wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-buddy-hield-vs-ros-de-aaron-fox
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hield leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Hield | 0 | 0 | 1,737 | 2,817 | 7,075 | 13,888 |
| 🏳️ Fox | 0 | 0 | 847 | 2,248 | 6,155 | 14,204 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HieldActive · Charlotte Hornets | FoxActive · San Antonio Spurs |
|---|---|---|
| NBA games | 1,063 | 665 |
| NBA points | 14,664 | 14,204 |
| NBA award: All-Rookie 1st Team | 1 | — |
| NBA award: Oscar Robertson Trophy | 1 | — |
| NBA award: John R. Wooden Award | 1 | — |
| Big 12 Conference Men's Basketball Player of the Year | 1 | — |
| Sporting News Men's College Basketball Player of the Year | 1 | — |
| Oscar Robertson Trophy | 1 | — |
| Naismith College Player of the Year | 1 | — |
| John R. Wooden Award | 1 | — |
| NBA award: NBA Cup All-Tournament Team | — | 1 |
| NBA award: All-NBA 3rd Team | — | 1 |
| NBA award: Clutch Player of the Year | — | 1 |
| Number | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 56 | 56.3 |
| Peak w20% | 74.1 | 74.6 |
| Longevity w20% | 57 | 53.8 |
| Honours w20% | 38 | 38 |
| Statistics w15% | 73.6 | 73.3 |
Buddy Hield leads with a GOAT score of 58.9 against 58.4 for De'Aaron Fox — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Fox scores higher on peak, dominance. Hield leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hield: 58.9, Fox: 58.4.
Make your case for Hield vs Fox. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.