Who is better, Raleigh or Armstrong?
Shawn Armstrong leads with a GOAT score of 61.4 against 61.2 for Cal Raleigh — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Armstrong wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Raleigh wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-cal-raleigh-vs-ros-shawn-armstrong
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Armstrong leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Raleigh | 0 | 0 | 25 | 103 | 489 | 568 |
| 🏳️ Armstrong | 0 | 0 | 11 | 18 | 179 | 467 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | RaleighActive · Seattle Mariners | ArmstrongActive · Cleveland Guardians |
|---|---|---|
| MLB games | 747 | 409 |
| MLB hits | 568 | — |
| MLB home runs | 176 | — |
| MLB award: Baseball America Short-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: MiLB.com Organization All-Star | 2 | 1 |
| MLB award: CAL Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: CAL Post-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: CAL Rookie of the Year | 1 | — |
| MLB award: Rawlings AL Gold Glove | 1 | — |
| MLB award: Mariners MVP | 2 | — |
| MLB award: AL All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: AL Silver Slugger | 1 | — |
| Number | 29 | 43 |
| MLB wins | — | 24 |
| MLB strikeouts | — | 706 |
| MLB award: CAR Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: EAS Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: INT Mid-Season All-Star | — | 2 |
| MLB award: PCL Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 65.8 | 59 |
| Peak w20% | 61.6 | 62 |
| Longevity w20% | 44.2 | 63.4 |
| Honours w20% | 70 | 56 |
| Statistics w15% | 64.1 | 69.1 |
Shawn Armstrong leads with a GOAT score of 61.4 against 61.2 for Cal Raleigh — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Raleigh scores higher on dominance, honours. Armstrong leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Raleigh: 61.2, Armstrong: 61.4.
Make your case for Raleigh vs Armstrong. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.