Who is better, Mullins or Yastrzemski?
Cedric Mullins leads with a GOAT score of 60.3 against 60.1 for Mike Yastrzemski — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Mullins wins: Longevity, Statistics
Yastrzemski wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-cedric-mullins-disc-tampa-bay-rays-vs-ros-mike-yastrzemski
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Mullins leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Mullins | 0 | 0 | 40 | 46 | 416 | 889 |
| 🏳️ Yastrzemski | 0 | 0 | 101 | 158 | 444 | 846 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MullinsActive · Tampa Bay Rays | YastrzemskiActive · Atlanta Braves |
|---|---|---|
| MLB games | 960 | 977 |
| MLB hits | 889 | 846 |
| MLB home runs | 135 | 152 |
| MLB award: MiLB.com Organization All-Star | 2 | 2 |
| MLB award: Baseball America Double-A All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: AL All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: AL Silver Slugger | 1 | — |
| Number | 31 | 18 |
| MLB award: NYP Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: SAL Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: EAS Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 60.2 | 61 |
| Peak w20% | 70.5 | 72 |
| Longevity w20% | 53.8 | 50.6 |
| Honours w20% | 50 | 50 |
| Statistics w15% | 69.2 | 68.7 |
Cedric Mullins leads with a GOAT score of 60.3 against 60.1 for Mike Yastrzemski — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Yastrzemski scores higher on peak, dominance. Mullins leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Mullins: 60.3, Yastrzemski: 60.1.
Make your case for Mullins vs Yastrzemski. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.