Who is better, Holmgren or Johnson?
Keldon Johnson leads with a GOAT score of 49.4 against 49.3 for Chet Holmgren — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Keldon Johnson above Chet Holmgren: 49.4 vs 49.3. Keldon Johnson leads on Longevity, Statistics, Peak. Chet Holmgren leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Johnson wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Holmgren wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-chet-holmgren-vs-ros-keldon-johnson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Johnson leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Holmgren | 0 | 0 | 1,353 | 1,833 | 3,013 | 3,013 |
| 🏳️ Johnson | 0 | 0 | 155 | 1,038 | 3,699 | 6,842 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HolmgrenActive · Oklahoma City Thunder | JohnsonActive · San Antonio Spurs |
|---|---|---|
| NBA games | 183 | 452 |
| NBA points | 3,013 | 6,842 |
| NBA award: All-NBA 3rd Team | 1 | — |
| NBA award: All-Defensive 1st Team | 1 | — |
| NBA award: All-Rookie 1st Team | 1 | — |
| Number | 7 | 3 |
| NBA award: Sixth Man of the Year | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 51.8 | 46 |
| Peak w20% | 65.5 | 66 |
| Longevity w20% | 34.6 | 47.4 |
| Honours w20% | 38 | 26 |
| Statistics w15% | 58 | 67 |
Keldon Johnson leads with a GOAT score of 49.4 against 49.3 for Chet Holmgren — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Holmgren scores higher on dominance, honours. Johnson leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Holmgren: 49.3, Johnson: 49.4.
Make your case for Holmgren vs Johnson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.