Who is better, Vázquez or Happ?
Ian Happ leads with a GOAT score of 64.9 against 64.8 for Christian Vázquez — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Happ wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Vázquez wins: Peak, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-christian-vazquez-vs-ros-ian-happ
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Happ leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Vázquez | 0 | 0 | 42 | 42 | 227 | 745 |
| 🏳️ Happ | 0 | 0 | 92 | 182 | 375 | 950 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | VázquezActive · Houston Astros | HappActive · Chicago Cubs |
|---|---|---|
| MLB games | 1,079 | 1,292 |
| MLB hits | 969 | 1,069 |
| MLB home runs | 87 | 197 |
| MLB award: CAR Post-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: EAS Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: MiLB.com Organization All-Star | 1 | 1 |
| MLB award: INT Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: World Series Championship | 2 | — |
| MLB award: Baseball America Short-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: CAR Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: NL All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: Rawlings NL Gold Glove | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 64 | 65.9 |
| Peak w20% | 71.9 | 63.8 |
| Longevity w20% | 63.4 | 57 |
| Honours w20% | 56 | 68 |
| Statistics w15% | 70.1 | 71 |
Ian Happ leads with a GOAT score of 64.9 against 64.8 for Christian Vázquez — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Vázquez scores higher on peak, longevity. Happ leads on dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Vázquez: 64.8, Happ: 64.9.
Make your case for Vázquez vs Happ. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.