Who is better, Pérez or Acuña?
Cionel Pérez leads with a GOAT score of 45.7 against 45.7 for Luisangel Acuña — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Pérez wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Acuña wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-cionel-perez-disc-new-york-mets-vs-ros-luisangel-acuna
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Pérez leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Pérez | 0 | 0 | 12 | 19 | 107 | 302 |
| 🏳️ Acuña | 0 | 0 | 12 | 53 | 99 | 99 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | PérezActive · New York Mets | AcuñaActive · Chicago White Sox |
|---|---|---|
| MLB games | 295 | 211 |
| MLB wins | 23 | — |
| MLB strikeouts | 302 | — |
| MLB award: TEX Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| Number | 52 | — |
| MLB hits | — | 99 |
| MLB home runs | — | 4 |
| MLB award: DSL Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: Baseball America DSL All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: CAR Post-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: MiLB.com Organization All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: TEX Post-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: Baseball America Double-A All-Star | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 40 | 49.2 |
| Peak w20% | 53.9 | 42.4 |
| Longevity w20% | 53.8 | 34.6 |
| Honours w20% | 26 | 56 |
| Statistics w15% | 59.6 | 45.6 |
Cionel Pérez leads with a GOAT score of 45.7 against 45.7 for Luisangel Acuña — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Acuña scores higher on dominance, honours. Pérez leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Pérez: 45.7, Acuña: 45.7.
Make your case for Pérez vs Acuña. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.