Who is better, Ingram or Vince?
James Vince leads with a GOAT score of 53.5 against 52.9 for Colin Ingram — a gap of 0.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Ingram vs Vince
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks James Vince above Colin Ingram: 53.5 vs 52.9. James Vince leads on Longevity, Statistics. Colin Ingram leads on Peak, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
VinceWinner
53.5Vince wins: Longevity, Statistics
Ingram
52.9Ingram wins: Dominance, Peak
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/ros-colin-ingram-vs-ros-james-vince
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🏳️ James Vince
53.5
Vince leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. James Vince
2. Colin Ingram
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🏳️ James Vince5 years played · career day 1,8251,403 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏳️ Colin Ingram5 years played · career day 3,2861,276 runs
-9.1% vs Vince at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Ingram | 0 | 0 | 380 | 527 | 992 | 1,276 |
| 🏳️ Vince | 0 | 0 | 125 | 524 | 1,403 | 2,487 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Vince53.5
Ingram52.9
FAQ
Where does Ingram beat Vince?
Ingram scores higher on peak, dominance. Vince leads on statistics, longevity.
How is the Ingram vs Vince score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ingram: 52.9, Vince: 53.5.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Ingram vs Vince. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.