Who is better, Parayko or Hutson?
Lane Hutson leads with a GOAT score of 49.4 against 49.3 for Colton Parayko — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Lane Hutson above Colton Parayko: 49.4 vs 49.3. Lane Hutson leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours. Colton Parayko leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Hutson wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Parayko wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-colton-parayko-vs-ros-lane-hutson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hutson leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Parayko | 0 | 0 | 33 | 68 | 159 | 259 |
| 🏳️ Hutson | 0 | 0 | 2 | 68 | 146 | 146 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ParaykoActive · St. Louis Blues | HutsonActive · Montreal Canadiens |
|---|---|---|
| NHL games | 800 | 166 |
| NHL goals | 81 | 18 |
| NHL assists | 232 | 128 |
| NHL points | 313 | 146 |
| NHL award: Stanley Cup | 1 | — |
| Number | 55 | 48 |
| NHL award: Calder Memorial Trophy | — | 1 |
| NHL award: E.J. McGuire Award of Excellence | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 42.1 | 51.9 |
| Peak w20% | 58.2 | 71.8 |
| Longevity w20% | 60.2 | 34.6 |
| Honours w20% | 26 | 32 |
| Statistics w15% | 66.1 | 58 |
Lane Hutson leads with a GOAT score of 49.4 against 49.3 for Colton Parayko — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Parayko scores higher on statistics, longevity. Hutson leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Parayko: 49.3, Hutson: 49.4.
Make your case for Parayko vs Hutson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.