Who is better, Kispert or Toppin?
Obi Toppin leads with a GOAT score of 45.8 against 45.1 for Corey Kispert — a gap of 0.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Toppin wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours
Kispert wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-corey-kispert-vs-ros-obi-toppin
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Toppin leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Kispert | 0 | 0 | 631 | 1,452 | 4,300 | 4,300 |
| 🏳️ Toppin | 0 | 0 | 254 | 902 | 3,073 | 3,351 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KispertActive · Atlanta Hawks | ToppinActive · Indiana Pacers |
|---|---|---|
| NBA games | 408 | 386 |
| NBA points | 4,300 | 3,351 |
| NBA award: Julius Erving Award | 1 | — |
| West Coast Conference Men's Basketball Player of the Year | 1 | — |
| Julius Erving Award | 1 | — |
| Number | 24 | 1 |
| NBA award: Oscar Robertson Trophy | — | 1 |
| NBA award: John R. Wooden Award | — | 1 |
| Atlantic 10 Conference Men's Basketball Player of the Year | — | 1 |
| Oscar Robertson Trophy | — | 1 |
| Associated Press College Basketball Player of the Year | — | 1 |
| Naismith College Player of the Year | — | 1 |
| John R. Wooden Award | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 42.5 | 43.1 |
| Peak w20% | 58.9 | 54.2 |
| Longevity w20% | 41 | 44.2 |
| Honours w20% | 26 | 32 |
| Statistics w15% | 62 | 59.6 |
Obi Toppin leads with a GOAT score of 45.8 against 45.1 for Corey Kispert — a gap of 0.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Kispert scores higher on peak, statistics. Toppin leads on dominance, honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kispert: 45.1, Toppin: 45.8.
Make your case for Kispert vs Toppin. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.