Who is better, Jansen or Gallen?
Zac Gallen leads with a GOAT score of 58.8 against 58.7 for Danny Jansen — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Gallen wins: Peak, Statistics
Jansen wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-danny-jansen-vs-ros-zac-gallen
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Gallen leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Jansen | 0 | 0 | 20 | 92 | 211 | 546 |
| 🏳️ Gallen | 0 | 0 | 192 | 274 | 825 | 1,220 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | JansenActive · Texas Rangers | GallenActive · Arizona Diamondbacks |
|---|---|---|
| MLB games | 662 | 197 |
| MLB hits | 546 | — |
| MLB home runs | 117 | — |
| MLB award: FSL Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | 1 |
| MLB award: EAS Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: MiLB.com Organization All-Star | 2 | — |
| MLB award: INT Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: INT Post-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: Baseball America Triple-A All-Star | 1 | 1 |
| MLB wins | — | 72 |
| MLB strikeouts | — | 1,220 |
| MLB award: PCL Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: NL All-Star | — | 1 |
| Number | — | 23 |
| Dominance w25% | 59.1 | 58 |
| Peak w20% | 56.3 | 71.9 |
| Longevity w20% | 53.8 | 50.6 |
| Honours w20% | 62 | 44 |
| Statistics w15% | 63.5 | 73 |
Zac Gallen leads with a GOAT score of 58.8 against 58.7 for Danny Jansen — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Jansen scores higher on dominance, honours, longevity. Gallen leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Jansen: 58.7, Gallen: 58.8.
Make your case for Jansen vs Gallen. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.