GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Warner vs Narine

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
WarnerWinner
73.4

Warner wins: Longevity, Statistics

Narine
72.8

Narine wins: no category outright

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/ros-david-warner-vs-ros-sunil-narine

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🏳️ David Warner
73.4

Warner leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.

1. David Warner
73.4
2. Sunil Narine
72.8

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🏳️ David Warner5 years played · career day 1,8255,701 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏳️ Sunil Narine5 years played · career day 1,825240 runs
-95.8% vs Warner at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🏳️ Warner005421,1975,70115,873
🏳️ Narine00392240373

Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.

MetricWarnerActive · Karachi KingsNarineActive · Trinbago Knight Riders
Matches (T20 leagues + internationals)580447
Runs25,8183,526
Wickets4506
Player of the match5536
Number3174
Dominance w25%72.572.5
Peak w20%7575
Longevity w20%7573
Honours w20%7070
Statistics w15%7573.9

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Warner73.4
Narine72.8
The people
Warner
Narine

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

FAQ

Who is better, Warner or Narine?

David Warner leads with a GOAT score of 73.4 against 72.8 for Sunil Narine — a gap of 0.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.

Where does Narine beat Warner?

Narine does not lead any of the five categories; Warner is ahead or level on all of them.

How is the Warner vs Narine score calculated?

Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Warner: 73.4, Narine: 72.8.

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Warner vs Narine. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →