Who is better, Walton or Lugo?
Seth Lugo leads with a GOAT score of 55.5 against 55.2 for Donovan Walton — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Lugo wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Walton wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-donovan-walton-disc-philadelphia-phillies-vs-ros-seth-lugo
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Lugo leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Walton | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 42 | 166 |
| 🏳️ Lugo | 0 | 0 | 45 | 130 | 337 | 829 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | WaltonActive · Philadelphia Phillies | LugoActive · Kansas City Royals |
|---|---|---|
| MLB games | 161 | 393 |
| MLB hits | 166 | — |
| MLB home runs | 23 | — |
| MLB award: NWL Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: MiLB.com Organization All-Star | 3 | — |
| MLB award: CAL Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: TEX Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: Rawlings MiLB Gold Glove | 1 | — |
| Number | 18 | 67 |
| MLB wins | — | 71 |
| MLB strikeouts | — | 1,088 |
| MLB award: AL All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: Rawlings AL Gold Glove | — | 1 |
| Major League Baseball All-Star | — | 1 |
| Rawlings Gold Glove Award | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 58.9 | 50.2 |
| Peak w20% | 55.7 | 68.4 |
| Longevity w20% | 47.4 | 60.2 |
| Honours w20% | 62 | 32 |
| Statistics w15% | 49.6 | 72 |
Seth Lugo leads with a GOAT score of 55.5 against 55.2 for Donovan Walton — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Walton scores higher on dominance, honours. Lugo leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Walton: 55.2, Lugo: 55.5.
Make your case for Walton vs Lugo. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.