Who is better, May or Bader?
Dustin May leads with a GOAT score of 59.9 against 59.9 for Harrison Bader — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
May wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Bader wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-dustin-may-vs-ros-harrison-bader
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
May leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ May | 0 | 0 | 32 | 76 | 174 | 698 |
| 🏳️ Bader | 0 | 0 | 20 | 120 | 313 | 950 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MayActive · Milwaukee Brewers | BaderActive · Philadelphia Phillies |
|---|---|---|
| MLB games | 101 | 954 |
| MLB wins | 40 | — |
| MLB strikeouts | 698 | — |
| MLB award: MID Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: CAL Post-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: TEX Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | 1 |
| MLB award: TEX Post-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: World Series Championship | 1 | — |
| Number | 21 | — |
| MLB hits | — | 968 |
| MLB home runs | — | 122 |
| MLB award: MiLB.com Organization All-Star | — | 2 |
| MLB award: Rawlings NL Gold Glove | — | 1 |
| Rawlings Gold Glove Award | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 61.8 | 58.5 |
| Peak w20% | 73.5 | 73.1 |
| Longevity w20% | 47.4 | 57 |
| Honours w20% | 50 | 44 |
| Statistics w15% | 68.7 | 70 |
Dustin May leads with a GOAT score of 59.9 against 59.9 for Harrison Bader — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Bader scores higher on statistics, longevity. May leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. May: 59.9, Bader: 59.9.
Make your case for May vs Bader. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.