Who is better, Crews or McLain?
Matt McLain leads with a GOAT score of 41.2 against 41.0 for Dylan Crews — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Crews vs McLain
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Matt McLain above Dylan Crews: 41.2 vs 41.0. Matt McLain leads on Peak, Statistics. Dylan Crews leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
McLainWinner
41.2McLain wins: Peak, Statistics
Crews
41.0Crews wins: Dominance, Honours
Candidates
Locked to BaseballShareable URL · /compare/ros-dylan-crews-vs-ros-matt-mclain
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🏳️ Matt McLain
41.2
McLain leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Matt McLain
2. Dylan Crews
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 3 · Form index per season1. 🏳️ Matt McLain3 seasons played · career day 1,460299 home runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏳️ Dylan Crews3 seasons played · career day 1,095175 home runs
-41.5% vs McLain at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Crews | 0 | 0 | 26 | 87 | 175 | 175 |
| 🏳️ McLain | 0 | 0 | 106 | 106 | 299 | 299 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 3 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
McLain41.2
Crews41.0
FAQ
Where does Crews beat McLain?
Crews scores higher on dominance, honours. McLain leads on peak, statistics.
How is the Crews vs McLain score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Crews: 41.0, McLain: 41.2.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Crews vs McLain. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.