Who is better, Phillips or Weathers?
Evan Phillips leads with a GOAT score of 47.3 against 47.3 for Ryan Weathers — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Evan Phillips and Ryan Weathers level at 47.3. Evan Phillips leads on Longevity, Honours. Ryan Weathers leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Phillips wins: Longevity, Honours
Weathers wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-evan-phillips-vs-ros-ryan-weathers
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Phillips leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Phillips | 0 | 0 | 16 | 56 | 175 | 340 |
| 🏳️ Weathers | 0 | 0 | 72 | 75 | 278 | 421 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | PhillipsActive · Los Angeles Dodgers | WeathersActive · New York Yankees |
|---|---|---|
| MLB games | 279 | 97 |
| MLB wins | 19 | 18 |
| MLB strikeouts | 340 | 421 |
| MLB award: CAR Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: INT Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| Number | 59 | 40 |
| MLB award: MID Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 42.1 | 44.6 |
| Peak w20% | 52.3 | 63.2 |
| Longevity w20% | 53.8 | 44.2 |
| Honours w20% | 32 | 26 |
| Statistics w15% | 61.1 | 63.3 |
Evan Phillips leads with a GOAT score of 47.3 against 47.3 for Ryan Weathers — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Weathers scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Phillips leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Phillips: 47.3, Weathers: 47.3.
Make your case for Phillips vs Weathers. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.