Who is better, Stubbs or Santillan?
Tony Santillan leads with a GOAT score of 46.4 against 46.3 for Garrett Stubbs — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Santillan wins: Peak, Statistics
Stubbs wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-garrett-stubbs-vs-ros-tony-santillan
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Santillan leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Stubbs | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8 | 65 | 108 |
| 🏳️ Santillan | 0 | 0 | 56 | 77 | 199 | 235 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | StubbsActive · Philadelphia Phillies | SantillanActive · Cincinnati Reds |
|---|---|---|
| MLB games | 239 | 204 |
| MLB hits | 108 | — |
| MLB home runs | 7 | — |
| MLB award: CAL Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: MiLB.com Organization All-Star | 2 | — |
| MLB award: TEX Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: PCL Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| Number | 21 | 64 |
| MLB wins | — | 9 |
| MLB strikeouts | — | 235 |
| MLB award: PIO Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: MID Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: FSL Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 45 | 44.9 |
| Peak w20% | 40 | 51.8 |
| Longevity w20% | 50.6 | 44.2 |
| Honours w20% | 50 | 38 |
| Statistics w15% | 46.2 | 55.5 |
Tony Santillan leads with a GOAT score of 46.4 against 46.3 for Garrett Stubbs — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Stubbs scores higher on dominance, honours, longevity. Santillan leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Stubbs: 46.3, Santillan: 46.4.
Make your case for Stubbs vs Santillan. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.