Who is better, Conine or Holliday?
Griffin Conine leads with a GOAT score of 49.0 against 48.9 for Jackson Holliday — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Conine wins: Dominance, Honours
Holliday wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-griffin-conine-vs-ros-jackson-holliday
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Conine leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Conine | 0 | 0 | 22 | 42 | 112 | 112 |
| 🏳️ Holliday | 0 | 0 | 36 | 178 | 250 | 250 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 3 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ConineActive · Miami Marlins | HollidayActive · Baltimore Orioles |
|---|---|---|
| MLB games | 145 | 307 |
| MLB hits | 112 | 250 |
| MLB home runs | 22 | 29 |
| MLB award: NWL Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: MID Post-Season All-Star | 2 | — |
| MLB award: Baseball America Low Class A All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: MiLB.com Organization All-Star | 3 | 1 |
| Number | 18 | — |
| MLB award: SAL Post-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: Baseball America High Class A All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: Baseball America Triple-A All-Star | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 54 | 52.2 |
| Peak w20% | 46 | 60.4 |
| Longevity w20% | 34.6 | 34.6 |
| Honours w20% | 62 | 44 |
| Statistics w15% | 46.6 | 53.5 |
Griffin Conine leads with a GOAT score of 49.0 against 48.9 for Jackson Holliday — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Holliday scores higher on peak, statistics. Conine leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Conine: 49.0, Holliday: 48.9.
Make your case for Conine vs Holliday. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.