Who is better, Kim or Okert?
Steven Okert leads with a GOAT score of 48.1 against 48.0 for Ha-seong Kim — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Okert wins: Longevity, Statistics
Kim wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-ha-seong-kim-vs-ros-steven-okert
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Okert leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Kim | 0 | 0 | 54 | 184 | 498 | 512 |
| 🏳️ Okert | 0 | 0 | 14 | 36 | 44 | 253 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KimActive · Atlanta Braves | OkertActive · Houston Astros |
|---|---|---|
| MLB games | 637 | 408 |
| MLB hits | 512 | — |
| MLB home runs | 57 | — |
| MLB award: Padres MVP | 1 | — |
| MLB award: Rawlings NL Gold Glove | 1 | — |
| KBO League Golden Glove Award | 1 | — |
| Rawlings Gold Glove Award | 1 | — |
| MLB wins | — | 24 |
| MLB strikeouts | — | 405 |
| MLB award: CAL Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: MiLB.com Organization All-Star | — | 1 |
| Number | — | 48 |
| Dominance w25% | 45.9 | 43 |
| Peak w20% | 59.7 | 53.9 |
| Longevity w20% | 44.2 | 53.8 |
| Honours w20% | 32 | 32 |
| Statistics w15% | 62.2 | 62.9 |
Steven Okert leads with a GOAT score of 48.1 against 48.0 for Ha-seong Kim — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Kim scores higher on peak, dominance. Okert leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kim: 48.0, Okert: 48.1.
Make your case for Kim vs Okert. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.