Who is better, Vanaken or Foden?
Phil Foden leads with a GOAT score of 57.4 against 54.4 for Hans Vanaken — a gap of 3.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Foden wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Vanaken wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-hans-vanaken-vs-ros-phil-foden
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Foden leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Vanaken | 0 | 0 | 6 | 9 | 35 | 52 |
| 🏳️ Foden | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 37 | 101 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | VanakenActive · Club Brugge | FodenActive · Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| League starts | 160 | — |
| League goals | 56 | — |
| League assists | 5 | — |
| Belgian professional football awards | 1 | — |
| Shirt number | 20 | 47 |
| Premier League apps | — | 229 |
| Premier League goals | — | 68 |
| Premier League assists | — | 35 |
| BBC Young Sports Personality of the Year | — | 1 |
| Alan Hardaker Trophy | — | 1 |
| Premier League Young Player of the Season | — | 1 |
| PFA Young Player of the Year | — | 1 |
| FIFA Ballon d'Or | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 48.2 | 53.5 |
| Peak w20% | 70.4 | 75 |
| Longevity w20% | 60.2 | 57 |
| Honours w20% | 26 | 32 |
| Statistics w15% | 73.8 | 74.5 |
Phil Foden leads with a GOAT score of 57.4 against 54.4 for Hans Vanaken — a gap of 3.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Vanaken scores higher on longevity. Foden leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Vanaken: 54.4, Foden: 57.4.
Make your case for Vanaken vs Foden. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.