Who is better, Happ or Straw?
Myles Straw leads with a GOAT score of 65.2 against 64.9 for Ian Happ — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Straw wins: Dominance, Peak
Happ wins: Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-ian-happ-vs-ros-myles-straw
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Straw leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Happ | 0 | 0 | 92 | 182 | 375 | 950 |
| 🏳️ Straw | 0 | 0 | 3 | 32 | 473 | 723 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HappActive · Chicago Cubs | StrawActive · Toronto Blue Jays |
|---|---|---|
| MLB games | 1,292 | 844 |
| MLB hits | 1,069 | 723 |
| MLB home runs | 197 | 17 |
| MLB award: Baseball America Short-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: CAR Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | 1 |
| MLB award: MiLB.com Organization All-Star | 1 | 2 |
| MLB award: NL All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: Rawlings NL Gold Glove | 4 | — |
| MLB award: Baseball America Low Class A All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: CAR Post-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: TEX Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: Rawlings AL Gold Glove | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 65.9 | 68.3 |
| Peak w20% | 63.8 | 74.7 |
| Longevity w20% | 57 | 53.8 |
| Honours w20% | 68 | 62 |
| Statistics w15% | 71 | 66.7 |
Myles Straw leads with a GOAT score of 65.2 against 64.9 for Ian Happ — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Happ scores higher on honours, statistics, longevity. Straw leads on peak, dominance.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Happ: 64.9, Straw: 65.2.
Make your case for Happ vs Straw. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.