Who is better, Ihsanullah or Hammond?
Wally Hammond leads with a GOAT score of 93.0 against 18.2 for Ihsanullah — a gap of 74.8 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Wally Hammond above Ihsanullah: 93.0 vs 18.2. Wally Hammond leads on Statistics, Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Hammond wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Ihsanullah wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-ihsanullah-vs-wally-hammond
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hammond leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Ihsanullah — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Ihsanullah | 0 | 0 | 1 | 23 | 23 | 23 |
| 🇬🇧 Hammond | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 150 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | IhsanullahActive · Karachi Kings | HammondRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Matches (T20 leagues + internationals) | 16 | — |
| Runs | 0 | — |
| Wickets | 23 | — |
| Player of the match | 1 | — |
| Number | 52 | — |
| Test runs | — | 7,249 |
| Test batting average | — | 58.45 |
| First-class centuries | — | 167 |
| Test centuries | — | 22 |
| Test wickets | — | 83 |
| Dominance w25% | 18.3 | 92 |
| Peak w20% | 22.8 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 16.3 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 14.3 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 19.5 | 96 |
Wally Hammond leads with a GOAT score of 93.0 against 18.2 for Ihsanullah — a gap of 74.8 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Ihsanullah does not lead any of the five categories; Hammond is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ihsanullah: 18.2, Hammond: 93.0.
Make your case for Ihsanullah vs Hammond. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.