Who is better, Vargas or Rogers?
Taylor Rogers leads with a GOAT score of 58.7 against 58.5 for Ildemaro Vargas — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Rogers wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Vargas wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-ildemaro-vargas-vs-ros-taylor-rogers
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Rogers leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Vargas | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 106 | 380 |
| 🏳️ Rogers | 0 | 0 | 64 | 113 | 278 | 657 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | VargasActive · Arizona Diamondbacks | RogersActive · Minnesota Twins |
|---|---|---|
| MLB games | 599 | 629 |
| MLB hits | 495 | — |
| MLB home runs | 34 | — |
| MLB award: SOU Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: MiLB.com Organization All-Star | 2 | — |
| MLB award: PCL Mid-Season All-Star | 2 | — |
| MLB award: PCL Post-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: VWL Finals MVP | 1 | — |
| MLB wins | — | 44 |
| MLB strikeouts | — | 816 |
| MLB award: FSL Post-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: EAS Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: INT Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: AL All-Star | — | 1 |
| Number | — | 55 |
| Dominance w25% | 58.2 | 55.6 |
| Peak w20% | 54.5 | 67.2 |
| Longevity w20% | 57 | 60.2 |
| Honours w20% | 62 | 44 |
| Statistics w15% | 61.7 | 70.2 |
Taylor Rogers leads with a GOAT score of 58.7 against 58.5 for Ildemaro Vargas — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Vargas scores higher on dominance, honours. Rogers leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Vargas: 58.5, Rogers: 58.7.
Make your case for Vargas vs Rogers. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.