Who is better, Paredes or Hayes?
Isaac Paredes leads with a GOAT score of 66.1 against 66.1 for Ke'Bryan Hayes — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Paredes wins: Dominance, Peak
Hayes wins: Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-isaac-paredes-vs-ros-ke-bryan-hayes
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Paredes leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Paredes | 0 | 0 | 22 | 37 | 228 | 726 |
| 🏳️ Hayes | 0 | 0 | 32 | 125 | 382 | 747 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ParedesActive · Houston Astros | HayesActive · Cincinnati Reds |
|---|---|---|
| MLB games | 718 | 720 |
| MLB hits | 726 | 747 |
| MLB home runs | 135 | 52 |
| MLB award: ACL Post-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: FSL Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | 1 |
| MLB award: MiLB.com Organization All-Star | 3 | 3 |
| MLB award: EAS Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | 1 |
| MLB award: EAS Post-Season All-Star | 1 | 1 |
| MLB award: AL All-Star | 2 | — |
| Number | 15 | — |
| MLB award: SAL Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: Rawlings MiLB Gold Glove | — | 3 |
| MLB award: Rawlings NL Gold Glove | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 71.7 | 71.5 |
| Peak w20% | 73.4 | 73.1 |
| Longevity w20% | 47.4 | 47.4 |
| Honours w20% | 70 | 70 |
| Statistics w15% | 66.8 | 67.2 |
Isaac Paredes leads with a GOAT score of 66.1 against 66.1 for Ke'Bryan Hayes — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Hayes scores higher on statistics. Paredes leads on peak, dominance.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Paredes: 66.1, Hayes: 66.1.
Make your case for Paredes vs Hayes. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.