Who is better, Crawford or Dubón?
J. P. Crawford leads with a GOAT score of 63.9 against 63.7 for Mauricio Dubón — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Crawford wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Dubón wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-j-p-crawford-vs-ros-mauricio-dubon
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Crawford leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Crawford | 0 | 0 | 15 | 40 | 339 | 837 |
| 🏳️ Dubón | 0 | 0 | 58 | 101 | 377 | 730 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CrawfordActive · Seattle Mariners | DubónActive · Atlanta Braves |
|---|---|---|
| MLB games | 1,044 | 815 |
| MLB hits | 925 | 730 |
| MLB home runs | 80 | 59 |
| MLB award: FCL Post-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: SAL Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | 1 |
| MLB award: MiLB.com Organization All-Star | 3 | 4 |
| MLB award: EAS Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: Rawlings AL Gold Glove | 1 | 2 |
| MLB award: NYP Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: CAR Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: SOU Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: World Series Championship | — | 1 |
| Number | — | 14 |
| Dominance w25% | 64.7 | 67 |
| Peak w20% | 67.3 | 64 |
| Longevity w20% | 57 | 50.6 |
| Honours w20% | 62 | 70 |
| Statistics w15% | 69.7 | 67 |
J. P. Crawford leads with a GOAT score of 63.9 against 63.7 for Mauricio Dubón — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Dubón scores higher on dominance, honours. Crawford leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Crawford: 63.9, Dubón: 63.7.
Make your case for Crawford vs Dubón. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.