Who is better, Flaherty or Gore?
MacKenzie Gore leads with a GOAT score of 59.2 against 59.1 for Jack Flaherty — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Gore wins: Dominance, Honours
Flaherty wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-jack-flaherty-vs-ros-mackenzie-gore
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Gore leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Flaherty | 0 | 0 | 20 | 202 | 567 | 1,472 |
| 🏳️ Gore | 0 | 0 | 72 | 223 | 763 | 763 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FlahertyActive · Detroit Tigers | GoreActive · Texas Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| MLB games | 217 | 138 |
| MLB wins | 87 | 34 |
| MLB strikeouts | 1,574 | 763 |
| MLB award: TEX Post-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: MiLB.com Organization All-Star | 1 | 1 |
| MLB award: World Series Championship | 1 | — |
| MLB award: Baseball America Rookie All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: CAL Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: CAL Post-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: Baseball America High Class A All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: NL All-Star | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 56.4 | 62.4 |
| Peak w20% | 74.7 | 68.8 |
| Longevity w20% | 57 | 41 |
| Honours w20% | 38 | 56 |
| Statistics w15% | 74 | 69.8 |
MacKenzie Gore leads with a GOAT score of 59.2 against 59.1 for Jack Flaherty — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Flaherty scores higher on peak, statistics, longevity. Gore leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Flaherty: 59.1, Gore: 59.2.
Make your case for Flaherty vs Gore. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.