Who is better, McDaniels or Toppin?
Jaden McDaniels leads with a GOAT score of 45.9 against 45.8 for Obi Toppin — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
McDaniels wins: Peak, Statistics
Toppin wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-jaden-mcdaniels-vs-ros-obi-toppin
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
McDaniels leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ McDaniels | 0 | 0 | 428 | 1,072 | 3,784 | 4,864 |
| 🏳️ Toppin | 0 | 0 | 254 | 902 | 3,073 | 3,351 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | McDanielsActive · Minnesota Timberwolves | ToppinActive · Indiana Pacers |
|---|---|---|
| NBA games | 439 | 386 |
| NBA points | 4,864 | 3,351 |
| NBA award: All-Defensive 2nd Team | 1 | — |
| Number | 3 | 1 |
| NBA award: Oscar Robertson Trophy | — | 1 |
| NBA award: John R. Wooden Award | — | 1 |
| Atlantic 10 Conference Men's Basketball Player of the Year | — | 1 |
| Oscar Robertson Trophy | — | 1 |
| Associated Press College Basketball Player of the Year | — | 1 |
| Naismith College Player of the Year | — | 1 |
| John R. Wooden Award | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 42.5 | 43.1 |
| Peak w20% | 59.1 | 54.2 |
| Longevity w20% | 44.2 | 44.2 |
| Honours w20% | 26 | 32 |
| Statistics w15% | 62.9 | 59.6 |
Jaden McDaniels leads with a GOAT score of 45.9 against 45.8 for Obi Toppin — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Toppin scores higher on dominance, honours. McDaniels leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. McDaniels: 45.9, Toppin: 45.8.
Make your case for McDaniels vs Toppin. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.