Who is better, Junis or Siri?
Jose Siri leads with a GOAT score of 56.1 against 56.0 for Jakob Junis — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Siri wins: Dominance, Honours
Junis wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-jakob-junis-vs-ros-jose-siri
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Siri leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Junis | 0 | 0 | 80 | 244 | 468 | 819 |
| 🏳️ Siri | 0 | 0 | 14 | 142 | 294 | 346 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | JunisActive · Texas Rangers | SiriActive · Los Angeles Angels |
|---|---|---|
| MLB games | 300 | 477 |
| MLB wins | 51 | — |
| MLB strikeouts | 856 | — |
| MLB award: TEX Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: TEX Post-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: MiLB.com Organization All-Star | 1 | 2 |
| Number | 16 | 28 |
| MLB hits | — | 346 |
| MLB home runs | — | 70 |
| MLB award: PIO Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: MID Post-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: Baseball America Low Class A All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: PCL Post-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: Caribbean Series All-Star | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 52.4 | 59.5 |
| Peak w20% | 66.8 | 57 |
| Longevity w20% | 57 | 44.2 |
| Honours w20% | 38 | 62 |
| Statistics w15% | 70.5 | 57.4 |
Jose Siri leads with a GOAT score of 56.1 against 56.0 for Jakob Junis — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Junis scores higher on peak, statistics, longevity. Siri leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Junis: 56.0, Siri: 56.1.
Make your case for Junis vs Siri. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.