Who is better, Wallstedt or Fetisov?
Viacheslav Fetisov leads with a GOAT score of 92.1 against 13.9 for Jesper Wallstedt — a gap of 78.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Wallstedt vs Fetisov
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
FetisovWinner
92.1Fetisov wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Wallstedt
13.9Wallstedt wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to Ice HockeyShareable URL · /compare/ros-jesper-wallstedt-vs-viacheslav-fetisov
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇷🇺 Viacheslav Fetisov
92.1
Fetisov leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Wallstedt — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
1. Viacheslav Fetisov
2. Jesper Wallstedt
Category breakdown
Season form · Points per season
Career timeline · Points per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Points per season1. 🇷🇺 Viacheslav Fetisov5 seasons played · career day 1,825297 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏳️ Jesper Wallstedt3 seasons played · career day 1,09520 points
-93.3% vs Fetisov at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Wallstedt | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 20 |
| 🇷🇺 Fetisov | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 297 | 620 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Fetisov92.1
Wallstedt13.9
FAQ
Where does Wallstedt beat Fetisov?
Wallstedt does not lead any of the five categories; Fetisov is ahead or level on all of them.
How is the Wallstedt vs Fetisov score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Wallstedt: 13.9, Fetisov: 92.1.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Wallstedt vs Fetisov. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.