Who is better, Giles-Harris or Baugh?
Sammy Baugh leads with a GOAT score of 92.3 against 16.0 for Joe Giles-Harris — a gap of 76.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Sammy Baugh above Joe Giles-Harris: 92.3 vs 16.0. Sammy Baugh leads on Honours, Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Baugh wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Giles-Harris wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-joe-giles-harris-vs-sammy-baugh
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Baugh leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Giles-Harris — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Giles-Harris | 0 | 0 | 3 | 23 | 26 | 61 |
| 🇺🇸 Baugh | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 330 | 695 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Giles-HarrisActive · Cincinnati Bengals | BaughRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NFL games | 32 | — |
| NFL tackles | 61 | — |
| Number | 43 | — |
| NFL titles | — | 2 |
| Passing titles | — | 6 |
| Punting average | — | 45 |
| Career interceptions on defence | — | 31 |
| Seasons played | — | 16 |
| Dominance w25% | 15.9 | 92 |
| Peak w20% | 20.9 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 13.9 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 11.9 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 17.9 | 94 |
Sammy Baugh leads with a GOAT score of 92.3 against 16.0 for Joe Giles-Harris — a gap of 76.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Giles-Harris does not lead any of the five categories; Baugh is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Giles-Harris: 16.0, Baugh: 92.3.
Make your case for Giles-Harris vs Baugh. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.