Who is better, Wicks or Porter?
Logan Porter leads with a GOAT score of 36.8 against 36.7 for Jordan Wicks — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Wicks vs Porter
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
PorterWinner
36.8Porter wins: Dominance, Honours
Wicks
36.7Wicks wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to BaseballShareable URL · /compare/ros-jordan-wicks-vs-ros-logan-porter
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🏳️ Logan Porter
36.8
Porter leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Logan Porter
2. Jordan Wicks
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 4 · Form index per season1. 🏳️ Jordan Wicks4 seasons played · career day 1,46087 home runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏳️ Logan Porter3 seasons played · career day 1,4609 home runs
-89.7% vs Wicks at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Wicks | 0 | 0 | 24 | 66 | 87 | 87 |
| 🏳️ Porter | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 9 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 4 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | WicksActive · Chicago Cubs | PorterActive · Los Angeles Angels |
|---|---|---|
| MLB games | 30 | 19 |
| MLB wins | 6 | — |
| MLB strikeouts | 87 | — |
| MLB award: MiLB.com Organization All-Star | 1 | 2 |
| Number | 36 | 33 |
| MLB hits | — | 9 |
| MLB home runs | — | 1 |
| MLB award: APP Post-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: MID Post-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 34.5 | 38.3 |
| Peak w20% | 43 | 32.6 |
| Longevity w20% | 37.8 | 34.6 |
| Honours w20% | 26 | 44 |
| Statistics w15% | 44.9 | 33.4 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Porter36.8
Wicks36.7
FAQ
Where does Wicks beat Porter?
Wicks scores higher on peak, statistics, longevity. Porter leads on dominance, honours.
How is the Wicks vs Porter score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Wicks: 36.7, Porter: 36.8.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Wicks vs Porter. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.