Who is better, Mateo or Yarbrough?
Jorge Mateo leads with a GOAT score of 55.8 against 55.8 for Ryan Yarbrough — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Mateo wins: Dominance, Honours
Yarbrough wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-jorge-mateo-disc-tampa-bay-rays-vs-ros-ryan-yarbrough
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Mateo leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Mateo | 0 | 0 | 4 | 100 | 278 | 418 |
| 🏳️ Yarbrough | 0 | 0 | 128 | 245 | 467 | 830 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MateoActive · Tampa Bay Rays | YarbroughActive · New York Yankees |
|---|---|---|
| MLB games | 584 | 252 |
| MLB hits | 418 | — |
| MLB home runs | 44 | — |
| MLB award: MiLB.com Organization All-Star | 3 | 2 |
| MLB award: FSL Mid-Season All-Star | 2 | — |
| MLB award: Baseball America Double-A All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: PCL Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB wins | — | 71 |
| MLB strikeouts | — | 830 |
| MLB award: SOU Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: SOU Post-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| Number | — | 33 |
| Dominance w25% | 57.5 | 53 |
| Peak w20% | 52.9 | 62.1 |
| Longevity w20% | 47.4 | 53.8 |
| Honours w20% | 62 | 44 |
| Statistics w15% | 59.6 | 70.3 |
Jorge Mateo leads with a GOAT score of 55.8 against 55.8 for Ryan Yarbrough — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Yarbrough scores higher on peak, statistics, longevity. Mateo leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Mateo: 55.8, Yarbrough: 55.8.
Make your case for Mateo vs Yarbrough. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.