Who is better, Mateo or Grisham?
Trent Grisham leads with a GOAT score of 55.9 against 55.8 for Jorge Mateo — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Grisham wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Mateo wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-jorge-mateo-disc-tampa-bay-rays-vs-ros-trent-grisham
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Grisham leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Mateo | 0 | 0 | 4 | 100 | 278 | 418 |
| 🏳️ Grisham | 0 | 0 | 36 | 90 | 378 | 616 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MateoActive · Tampa Bay Rays | GrishamActive · New York Yankees |
|---|---|---|
| MLB games | 584 | 887 |
| MLB hits | 418 | 616 |
| MLB home runs | 44 | 122 |
| MLB award: MiLB.com Organization All-Star | 3 | 2 |
| MLB award: FSL Mid-Season All-Star | 2 | — |
| MLB award: Baseball America Double-A All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: PCL Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: Baseball America Rookie All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: SOU Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: Rawlings NL Gold Glove | — | 2 |
| Rawlings Gold Glove Award | — | 1 |
| Number | — | 12 |
| Dominance w25% | 57.5 | 55.4 |
| Peak w20% | 52.9 | 54.8 |
| Longevity w20% | 47.4 | 50.6 |
| Honours w20% | 62 | 56 |
| Statistics w15% | 59.6 | 65 |
Trent Grisham leads with a GOAT score of 55.9 against 55.8 for Jorge Mateo — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Mateo scores higher on dominance, honours. Grisham leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Mateo: 55.8, Grisham: 55.9.
Make your case for Mateo vs Grisham. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.