Who is better, Hazlewood or Kock?
Quinton de Kock leads with a GOAT score of 71.9 against 71.5 for Josh Hazlewood — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Hazlewood vs Kock
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Quinton de Kock above Josh Hazlewood: 71.9 vs 71.5. Quinton de Kock leads on Peak, Dominance. Josh Hazlewood leads on Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
KockWinner
71.9Kock wins: Dominance, Peak
Hazlewood
71.5Hazlewood wins: Statistics
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/ros-josh-hazlewood-vs-ros-quinton-de-kock
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🏳️ Quinton de Kock
71.9
Kock leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Quinton de Kock
2. Josh Hazlewood
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🏳️ Quinton de Kock5 years played · career day 1,8265,232 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏳️ Josh Hazlewood5 years played · career day 2,556153 runs
-97.1% vs Kock at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Hazlewood | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 26 | 240 |
| 🏳️ Kock | 0 | 0 | 30 | 964 | 3,051 | 11,239 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Kock71.9
Hazlewood71.5
FAQ
Where does Hazlewood beat Kock?
Hazlewood scores higher on statistics. Kock leads on peak, dominance.
How is the Hazlewood vs Kock score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hazlewood: 71.5, Kock: 71.9.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Hazlewood vs Kock. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.