Who is better, Naylor or O'Hearn?
Josh Naylor leads with a GOAT score of 63.2 against 63.2 for Ryan O'Hearn — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Naylor wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
O'Hearn wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-josh-naylor-vs-ros-ryan-o-hearn-disc-pittsburgh-pirates
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Naylor leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Naylor | 0 | 0 | 63 | 111 | 424 | 1,036 |
| 🏳️ O'Hearn | 0 | 0 | 39 | 103 | 210 | 798 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | NaylorActive · Seattle Mariners | O'HearnActive · Pittsburgh Pirates |
|---|---|---|
| MLB games | 894 | 847 |
| MLB hits | 1,036 | 798 |
| MLB home runs | 135 | 119 |
| MLB award: SAL Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | 1 |
| MLB award: CAL Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: TEX Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: TEX Post-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: MiLB.com Organization All-Star | 1 | 3 |
| MLB award: AL All-Star | 1 | 1 |
| Number | 12 | 29 |
| MLB award: PIO Post-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| Major League Baseball All-Star | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 65.4 | 64.9 |
| Peak w20% | 74.8 | 73.8 |
| Longevity w20% | 50.6 | 53.8 |
| Honours w20% | 56 | 56 |
| Statistics w15% | 70.7 | 68.2 |
Josh Naylor leads with a GOAT score of 63.2 against 63.2 for Ryan O'Hearn — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
O'Hearn scores higher on longevity. Naylor leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Naylor: 63.2, O'Hearn: 63.2.
Make your case for Naylor vs O'Hearn. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.