Who is better, Chouhan or Hammond?
Wally Hammond leads with a GOAT score of 93.0 against 19.7 for Kanishk Chouhan — a gap of 73.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Chouhan vs Hammond
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HammondWinner
93.0Hammond wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Chouhan
19.7Chouhan wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/ros-kanishk-chouhan-vs-wally-hammond
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Wally Hammond
93.0
Hammond leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Chouhan — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
1. Wally Hammond
2. Kanishk Chouhan
Category breakdown
Season form · Centuries per year
Career timeline · Centuries per year
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Centuries per year1. 🇬🇧 Wally Hammond5 years played · career day 4,382340 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏳️ Kanishk Chouhan0 years played0 runs
-100.0% vs Hammond at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Chouhan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 🇬🇧 Hammond | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 150 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Hammond93.0
Chouhan19.7
FAQ
Where does Chouhan beat Hammond?
Chouhan does not lead any of the five categories; Hammond is ahead or level on all of them.
How is the Chouhan vs Hammond score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Chouhan: 19.7, Hammond: 93.0.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Chouhan vs Hammond. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.