Who is better, MacDermid or Lorentz?
Steven Lorentz leads with a GOAT score of 40.8 against 39.8 for Kurtis MacDermid — a gap of 1.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Lorentz wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
MacDermid wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-kurtis-macdermid-vs-ros-steven-lorentz
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Lorentz leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ MacDermid | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 22 | 32 |
| 🏳️ Lorentz | 0 | 0 | 8 | 21 | 43 | 80 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Steven Lorentz leads with a GOAT score of 40.8 against 39.8 for Kurtis MacDermid — a gap of 1.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
MacDermid scores higher on longevity. Lorentz leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. MacDermid: 39.8, Lorentz: 40.8.
Make your case for MacDermid vs Lorentz. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.