Who is better, O'Connor or Stankoven?
Logan O'Connor leads with a GOAT score of 43.8 against 43.3 for Logan Stankoven — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Logan O'Connor above Logan Stankoven: 43.8 vs 43.3. Logan O'Connor leads on Longevity, Statistics. Logan Stankoven leads on Peak, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →O'Connor wins: Longevity, Statistics
Stankoven wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-logan-o-connor-vs-ros-logan-stankoven
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
O'Connor leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ O'Connor | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 57 | 105 |
| 🏳️ Stankoven | 0 | 0 | 14 | 52 | 96 | 96 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Logan O'Connor leads with a GOAT score of 43.8 against 43.3 for Logan Stankoven — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Stankoven scores higher on peak, dominance. O'Connor leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. O'Connor: 43.8, Stankoven: 43.3.
Make your case for O'Connor vs Stankoven. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.