Who is better, Varland or Bailey?
Louis Varland leads with a GOAT score of 51.0 against 50.8 for Patrick Bailey — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Varland wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Bailey wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-louis-varland-vs-ros-patrick-bailey
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Varland leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Varland | 0 | 0 | 21 | 92 | 386 | 386 |
| 🏳️ Bailey | 0 | 0 | 76 | 170 | 385 | 385 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | VarlandActive · Toronto Blue Jays | BaileyActive · Cleveland Guardians |
|---|---|---|
| MLB games | 182 | 462 |
| MLB wins | 18 | — |
| MLB strikeouts | 386 | — |
| MLB award: MiLB.com Organization All-Star | 1 | 1 |
| MLB award: INT Post-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: AL All-Star | 1 | — |
| Major League Baseball All-Star | 1 | — |
| Number | 77 | 16 |
| MLB hits | — | 385 |
| MLB home runs | — | 37 |
| MLB award: NWL Post-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: Rawlings MiLB Gold Glove | — | 1 |
| MLB award: Rawlings NL Gold Glove | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 51.4 | 53.1 |
| Peak w20% | 64.8 | 56.3 |
| Longevity w20% | 41 | 37.8 |
| Honours w20% | 38 | 50 |
| Statistics w15% | 62.4 | 58.3 |
Louis Varland leads with a GOAT score of 51.0 against 50.8 for Patrick Bailey — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Bailey scores higher on dominance, honours. Varland leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Varland: 51.0, Bailey: 50.8.
Make your case for Varland vs Bailey. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.