Who is better, Raley or Langford?
Luke Raley leads with a GOAT score of 46.2 against 46.2 for Wyatt Langford — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Luke Raley and Wyatt Langford level at 46.2. Luke Raley leads on Longevity. Wyatt Langford leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Raley wins: Longevity
Langford wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-luke-raley-vs-ros-wyatt-langford
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Raley leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Raley | 0 | 0 | 12 | 24 | 248 | 307 |
| 🏳️ Langford | 0 | 0 | 126 | 244 | 340 | 340 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | RaleyActive · Seattle Mariners | LangfordActive · Texas Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| MLB games | 478 | 375 |
| MLB hits | 307 | 340 |
| MLB home runs | 63 | 55 |
| MLB award: CAL Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: TEX Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: MiLB.com Organization All-Star | 1 | 1 |
| Number | 20 | 36 |
| MLB award: Rangers Rookie of the Year | — | 1 |
| MLB award: Rangers MVP | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 44.6 | 47.4 |
| Peak w20% | 51.3 | 56.7 |
| Longevity w20% | 44.2 | 34.6 |
| Honours w20% | 38 | 38 |
| Statistics w15% | 55.4 | 56.8 |
Luke Raley leads with a GOAT score of 46.2 against 46.2 for Wyatt Langford — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Langford scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Raley leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Raley: 46.2, Langford: 46.2.
Make your case for Raley vs Langford. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.