Who is better, Rashford or Foden?
Phil Foden leads with a GOAT score of 57.4 against 55.3 for Marcus Rashford — a gap of 2.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Foden wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Rashford wins: Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-marcus-rashford-vs-ros-phil-foden
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Foden leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Rashford | 0 | 0 | 7 | 13 | 65 | 122 |
| 🏳️ Foden | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 37 | 101 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | RashfordActive · Manchester United | FodenActive · Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| League starts | 217 | — |
| League goals | 87 | — |
| League assists | 40 | — |
| Fred and Anne Jarvis Award | 1 | — |
| Member of the Order of the British Empire | 1 | — |
| The Guardian Footballer of the Year | 1 | — |
| honorary doctorate | 1 | — |
| Shirt number | 9 | 47 |
| Premier League apps | — | 229 |
| Premier League goals | — | 68 |
| Premier League assists | — | 35 |
| BBC Young Sports Personality of the Year | — | 1 |
| Alan Hardaker Trophy | — | 1 |
| Premier League Young Player of the Season | — | 1 |
| PFA Young Player of the Year | — | 1 |
| FIFA Ballon d'Or | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 50.2 | 53.5 |
| Peak w20% | 74.5 | 75 |
| Longevity w20% | 57 | 57 |
| Honours w20% | 26 | 32 |
| Statistics w15% | 74.9 | 74.5 |
Phil Foden leads with a GOAT score of 57.4 against 55.3 for Marcus Rashford — a gap of 2.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Rashford scores higher on statistics. Foden leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Rashford: 55.3, Foden: 57.4.
Make your case for Rashford vs Foden. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.