Who is better, McLain or Wallner?
Matt Wallner leads with a GOAT score of 41.3 against 41.2 for Matt McLain — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Wallner wins: Longevity, Honours
McLain wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-matt-mclain-vs-ros-matt-wallner
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Wallner leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ McLain | 0 | 0 | 106 | 106 | 299 | 299 |
| 🏳️ Wallner | 0 | 0 | 13 | 66 | 211 | 211 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Matt Wallner leads with a GOAT score of 41.3 against 41.2 for Matt McLain — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
McLain scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Wallner leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. McLain: 41.2, Wallner: 41.3.
Make your case for McLain vs Wallner. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.