GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Short vs Hammond

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HammondWinner
93.0

Hammond wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics

Short
34.8

Short wins: no category outright

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/ros-matthew-short-vs-wally-hammond

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Wally Hammond
93.0

Hammond leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.

Short — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.

1. Wally Hammond
93.0
2. Matthew Short
Pending verification

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🏳️ Matthew Short3 years played · career day 1,095871 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Wally Hammond5 years played · career day 4,382340 runs
-61.0% vs Short at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🏳️ Short00284605871871
🇬🇧 Hammond00000150

Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.

MetricShortActive · Chennai Super KingsHammondRetired
Matches (T20 leagues + internationals)44—
Runs871—
Wickets10—
Player of the match1—
Number2—
Test runs—7,249
Test batting average—58.45
First-class centuries—167
Test centuries—22
Test wickets—83
Dominance w25%33.592
Peak w20%40.996
Longevity w20%34.692
Honours w20%2690
Statistics w15%40.996

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Hammond93.0
Short34.8
The people
Short
Hammond

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

FAQ

Who is better, Short or Hammond?

Wally Hammond leads with a GOAT score of 93.0 against 34.8 for Matthew Short — a gap of 58.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.

Where does Short beat Hammond?

Short does not lead any of the five categories; Hammond is ahead or level on all of them.

How is the Short vs Hammond score calculated?

Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Short: 34.8, Hammond: 93.0.

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Short vs Hammond. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →